Just about everyone I know is working feverishly to update their messaging strategies. The abrupt downturn in the economy has caused most prospects to rethink their priorities and "buying criteria"-- the capabilities that a buyer ranks highest during the purchase process. For most of us, this means that any messaging we developed prior to September 2008 needs to be rewritten.
So I thought if might be helpful if I shared some insight into the new priorities of the Chief Information Officer ("CIO"), one of the buyer personas most frequently cited by attendees of the Effective Product Marketing seminar.
Let's call this CIO persona Sam. Sam is on the executive team for a global, multi-billion dollar company that sells commodity products in a very mature market.
As a result of the economic downturn, Sam's budget for IT investments has been substantially reduced, causing him to re-evaluate every one of his plans for the IT projects he had slated for this year.
Sam says that he looks for answers to these three questions to conduct that evaluation:
- What does the technology do to support the company's strategy?
- What is the business case?
- How much risk is in the project?
In the past, Sam says that he could justify IT investments that helped the company make money. For example, last year he was able to recommend technology that made the people in his company more productive. But not now.
For the next year at least, Sam says that every IT investment will be evaluated for its ability to create predictable, measurable cost savings. Sam says it is just too hard to measure improvements in productivity and too risky to expect the company to make the changes needed to realize that benefit.
We asked Sam to give us more insight into this statement. He noted that people have grown accustomed to rapid improvements in relatively inexpensive, easy-to-use technology products in their personal lives. While Sam has different concerns with corporate technology, especially in the areas of security, support and compatibility, he faces major resistance if the solution is costly or requires changes in business processes.
Sam says that his priorities are single-threaded right now -- find places to reduce the IT budget -- even if that involves nontraditional ways of delivering IT. As much as Sam wishes that internal stakeholders would ask him for recommendations on what IT can do to make the company more productive, all anyone cares about is the budget.
In this respect at least, it should be easy for us as marketers to personally relate to Sam's pain. Most of us are in reaction mode with companies that have asked us to cut our budgets. If we simply cut out all of the wasted effort that wasn't going to impress Sam (or another buyer persona) anyway, we may be surprised at how easy it is to comply. In fact, this may be our best chance to eliminate the work that we always knew was a waste of time.
Students that were searching for the information related to buy paper at the custom writing service will read through your well done writing close to this post. In other case, this is possible to utilize the help of the essay writing service.
Posted by: Rebecca32 | December 28, 2009 at 04:06 AM
Great article - I found your conclusion most interesting -
"In fact, this may be our best chance to eliminate the work that we always knew was a waste of time." I have found small business, especially entrepreneurs, to be especially accustomed to this way of thinking. If the activity does not lead to the generation of revenue in the short term it must be shelved until later or abandoned altogether. Early stage companies simply do not have the resources to act otherwise and if they do try to do it all - they will likely die trying. Personally I had to learn the skill of knowing what to let slide and knowing what was necessary.
For this reason I believe that entrepreneurial minded individuals and companies are having an easier time with the recession than their larger counterparts who may not be used to operating in this capacity. When forced to only perform value-added activities to survive it is amazing how much becomes discarded due to not adding sufficient value to the bottom line. Even if an individual or business is not forced to do so I recommend going through this process anyway - at a minimum it makes one consider their actions and if their time and money are well spent.
Posted by: John R. Sedivy | April 03, 2009 at 07:23 AM
I think that is a good point, Adele: we must always target a variety of buyers. Having only one target in any organization we are selling to is very risky. Marketers must cover a variety of buyer types to ensure all key decision-makers are included in the process. Very rarely does just the CIO make even technology purchases without others being consulted.
Posted by: Brad Majors | February 09, 2009 at 01:52 PM
Thanks for that input Tom. What this means for sales and marketing is that we've got to understand and target the business buyer personas and not just the CIO. The CIO can say "no" to the deal, so he is relevant, but he is not the real decision maker for most technology solutions. Line of business buyers are not a single persona, either. Each part of the business has different priorities.
Posted by: Adele Revella | January 16, 2009 at 10:11 AM
This is a great persona for today's CIO. I'm seeing the list of projects CIO's are working on cut back to mostly those that are directly required / demanded by business units, rather than just internal IT efficiencies. Although server virtualization is still on the hot list, reducing server costs and energy consumption.
Posted by: Tom Kuhr | January 16, 2009 at 10:02 AM